To prevent spam users, you can only post on this forum after registration, which is by invitation. If you want to post on the forum, please send me a mail (h DOT m DOT w DOT verbeek AT tue DOT nl) and I'll send you an invitation in return for an account.
Metrics for evaluation and ProDiGen
Hey all,
I am currently developing an algorithm of process mining. I met two problems.
Problem one:
In my algorithm, it consists of a number of loops. In each loop, I want to evaluate a candidate by four metrics, including fitness, precise, generalization, simplicity. Can anybody tell me how can I implement it?
Problem two:
I want to compare my algorithm with ProDiGen algorithm. But I can not find the package. Can anybody tell me where can I find it?
Thank you in advance.
Regards.
SiYuan Jing
Answers

Dear SiYuan Jing,For themetrics, you could have a look at the way it is done in the Evolutionary Tree Miner, see the sources on https://svn.win.tue.nl/trac/prom/browser/Packages/EvolutionaryTreeMiner/Trunk/src/org/processmining/plugins/etm/fitness/metrics. Note that these metrics assume the model to be a process tree, I'm not sure whether this fits your needs.As far as I know, the ProDiGen algorithm is not available in any version of ProM that we distribute. I've found a link to a ProDiGen website (http://tec.citius.usc.es/SoftLearn/ProDiGen.html) but that results in an error message. Perhaps you could contact the authors of the paper (see for example https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/9783319101729_8) directly?Kind regards,Eric.

Dear Eric,
Thanks for your help.
I also wonder that is there a package provides these metrics which are based on petri net? Right now, PNetReplayer is employed in my algorithm. I follow a formula which is used for calculation of fitness value. Is it right?
total_fitness = Sigma(trace_fitness * trace_num) / total_trace_num
Kind regards,SiYuan Jing

Dear SiYuan Jing,This depends on which fitness metric you want to have. Your formula computes the average trace fitness, which is not exactly the same as the log fitness as reported by the PNetReplayer. The difference between both is that for the average trace fitness the fitness values are accumulated, whereas for the log fitness the replays costs are accumulated.Kind regards,Eric.

Dear Eric,
In the above formula, the "trace_fitness" is gotten by SyncReplayResult.getInfo(PNRepResult.TRACEFITNESS).
I studied the code of org.processmining.plugins.astar.petrinet.AbstractPetrinetReplayer.java.
In line 382386, the algorithm put the trace fitness into a SyncReplayResult object. I am not sure whether it is the log fitness or not. If not, where can I find the code for calculation of log fitness.
Additionally, I also wonder that where can I find a tool for calculation of precise, generalization and simplicity of a petri net model.
Regards,
SiYuan Jing 
Dear SiYuan Jing,No, this is not the log fitness. Every SyncReplayResult corresponds to one alignment, and its fitness to a trace fitness. Unfortunately, the trace fitness are not sufficient to compute the log fitness. In short, both the trace fitness and the log fitness are fractions. To compute the log fitness one needs to divide the sum of the trace fitness nominators by the sum of the trace fitness denominators. For example, if we have trace fitnesses 2/4 and 3/12, this would result in 5/16, which is not the same as for the trace fitnesses 1/2 (=2/4) and 1/4 (=3/12), which would result in 2/6 (>5/16).As far as I know, the PNetReplayer does not compute the log fitness.For the other metrics, you would have to check the literature. There exist different metrics for precision and simplicity. ProM includes some tools to compute these metrics, I guess. Perhaps https://svn.win.tue.nl/trac/prom/wiki/ProM69/Plugins can be of help, which lists all plugin sin ProM 6.9. You look look for "precision" and "generalization", for "simplicity" you could use the "Show Petrinet Metrics" plugin.Kind regards,Eric.

Dear Eric,
Thanks so much! It helps me a lot.
Regards,
SiYuan Jing
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
 1.5K All Categories
 45 Announcements / News
 215 Process Mining
 6  BPI Challenge 2020
 9  BPI Challenge 2019
 24  BPI Challenge 2018
 27  BPI Challenge 2017
 8  BPI Challenge 2016
 66 Research
 971 ProM 6
 377  Usage
 285  Development
 8 RapidProM
 1  Usage
 6  Development
 54 ProM5
 19  Usage
 185 Event Logs
 30  ProMimport
 75  XESame