To prevent spam users, you can only post on this forum after registration, which is by invitation. If you want to post on the forum, please send me a mail (h DOT m DOT w DOT verbeek AT tue DOT nl) and I'll send you an invitation in return for an account.
Why does fuzzy miner produce two separated process models extracted from the same event log?
Hello everyone,
Currently, I am working on a research project in which I utilized the fuzzy miner process discovery algorithm.
After I applied the Fuzzy miner on the event log, it produced two process models that are separated from each other. To my knowledge, I haven't seen such a case in the literature, and I would like to reason why there is such an isolation.
thank you for your time and assistance,
Best,
Erdem
Currently, I am working on a research project in which I utilized the fuzzy miner process discovery algorithm.
After I applied the Fuzzy miner on the event log, it produced two process models that are separated from each other. To my knowledge, I haven't seen such a case in the literature, and I would like to reason why there is such an isolation.
thank you for your time and assistance,
Best,
Erdem
Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- 1.6K All Categories
- 45 Announcements / News
- 225 Process Mining
- 6 - BPI Challenge 2020
- 9 - BPI Challenge 2019
- 24 - BPI Challenge 2018
- 27 - BPI Challenge 2017
- 8 - BPI Challenge 2016
- 68 Research
- 1K ProM 6
- 394 - Usage
- 288 - Development
- 9 RapidProM
- 1 - Usage
- 7 - Development
- 54 ProM5
- 19 - Usage
- 187 Event Logs
- 32 - ProMimport
- 75 - XESame